Bio/Overview: Dr. Chris Pearson is the recently named Superintendent, and partial principal, in the 400-student district of Conway, WA and former principal at West View Elementary, a high-poverty, high-minority P-6 Dual Language School in Burlington, WA. During his four-year tenure at West View, Pearson successfully led the school through a federal Turnaround School Improvement Grant. From 2010 to 2014, student achievement scores more than doubled in Math and nearly doubled in Reading. Additionally, West View has become a state model for its family engagement programs and its culturally responsive school environment. Previous to his experience at West View, Pearson also served as the principal of Allen K-8, a high-poverty school serving a large migrant Hispanic student population.
Pearson has also become a leader of principals in his region, facilitating Principal PLC’s in districts throughout northwest Washington, and presenting at several state conferences.Educational Values/Philosophy: Over the past 9 years, Pearson has developed a successful leadership style that creates a positive learning environment for all students and improves classroom instruction and student achievement. He believes strongly in the power of building positive, trusting relationships with all stakeholders in order to rally them around a collective, common vision. Pearson takes great pride in knowing all of his students and families by name, greeting each of them at the door each morning and personally celebrating their success.
He also believes in the value of engaging families and community resources in support of student growth. The mission at West View is “Cada Nino” or “Each Child,” empowering all teachers to develop an “individualized education for each student.” It is this commitment to knowing each student and their family that led to the school’s significant increase in student achievement, along with the development of model family engagement programs. At West View, the doors open at 8:00 am and don’t close until 8:00 pm. Students have access to tutoring and homework help in the evening while their parents take ELL and GED classes. Pearson also believes in the value of collaboration as the central component of adult learning.
His teachers gather weekly to engage in a “child study” process that identifies individual students’ strengths and needs for the purpose of planning intervention and enrichment strategies. This process also provides opportunities for teachers to share ideas and garner support from their colleagues. Vmware svga 3d driver.
This belief in collaboration transfers to Pearson’s leadership of other principals in his region. Pearson is passionate about creating professional growth opportunities for principals through peer collaboration, and he has facilitated a variety of Principal PLC’s where school leaders create goals and reflect on both their progress and the impact of their leadership on student achievement.Achievements: In 2014 Pearson was recognized by his state principals’ association as the Washington State Elementary School Principal of the Year. He was also celebrated by the National Association of Elementary Principals as a National Distinguished Principal.
His school was recognized in 2013 by the Washington Education Association as a High-Performing ‘Turnaround’ School. Pearson has presented on the topic of successful school leadership at several conferences, including the Washington Educator’s Conference and the Washington Principals’/Administrators’ Summer Conference. Additionally, Pearson was also a member of a panel presentation on successful family engagement practices at the 2010 NAESP National Conference.Education: Pearson recently received his doctorate in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies from the University of Washington’s Leadership for Learning Program. He holds a Master’s Degree in Teaching from American University, and a Bachelor of Arts in English Literacy from Pepperdine University.Areas of Interest/Expertise:. Rural Schools.
English Language Learners. Migrant Student Populations. Dual Language Education. Family Engagement. Principal Leadership. Principal and Teacher Evaluation. Equity Issues.
Federal and Local Policy Implementation.
In the Fellows Program, you’ll:. Confront leadership dilemmas in a range of environments that are very different from your own. Be motivated to look deep within yourself on issues critical to good leadership. Interact with leaders and leadership scholars both during and after the program. Take part in shared experiences that will strengthen your understanding of leadership in contextBuild your networkYou’ll have time to get to know the other fellows well when you share stories and journals of your leadership experiences. You’ll meet and interact with outstanding leaders and experts in the field of leadership. Sims 4 stoner trait.
The Pearson Fellowes Program Reviews
You’ll be invited to Tobias Leadership Center events and lectures. And you’ll work with our faculty fellows—a core group of IU faculty who do research, teach classes, and conduct workshops related to leadership. After successful completion of the Fellows Program, you’re automatically a member of the.
The American Epilepsy Society Fellows program provides support for fellows to attend the AES Annual Meeting and benefit from mentorship, networking, and professional development programs. Several of the professional development programs are open to all AES attendees, not solely those accepted into the AES Fellows Program.Apply by August 1, 2019 by submitting both the nomination form and the application form. ( Must be completed by fellow or postdoctoral trainee). (Must be completed by fellowship program director, or lab director/postdoctoral mentor)Fellows accepted to the program receive a $750 USD travel stipend to attend the AES Annual Meeting along with complimentary AES meeting registration and a complimentary one-year AES membership.
Congressional Fellowships and Foreign Policy: DOD vs. State August 25, 2009 Posted by Guest Blogger in.Tags:,This is the first of a series of Tuesday Guest Blogs, where Budget Insight invites various experts in a wide range of fields to write about what they know best.Travis SharpThe Center for Arms Control and Non-ProliferationAugust 24, 2009Since the end of the Cold War, the U.S. Military’s encroachment into an increasing number of foreign policy missions has intensified the long-standing animosity between the State Department and Congress.
The trend toward militarizing diplomacy has negatively impacted both congressional perceptions of State’s efficacy and Foggy Bottom’s ability to secure adequate funding.The Department of Defense (DOD) now receives funds for programs that duplicate efforts traditionally carried out by the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). From the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, DOD provided four percent of overall U.S. Development aid assistance in 1998; by 2005, its share had risen to 22 percent. In fiscal year 2010, the United States about 13 times more on its military than on diplomatic operations and aid, even though their respective functions are equally important to accomplishing U.S. Foreign policy objectives.Although DOD is a much larger organization than the State Department, DOD’s growing control over U.S. Foreign policy is partly attributable to its highly organized and efficient legislative operations, which are far superior to those of State and allow the Pentagon to dominate the zero-sum game of congressional budgeting.
DOD is much more committed than the State Department to its congressional fellowship programs, which send mid-career personnel to work in Congress and are considered career-enhancers by young military officers.The Pentagon plans to quadruple (to a total of 100) the number of military fellows serving in Congress by 2009 as part of a complete revamping of its legislative affairs office, the office’s first restructuring in almost 20 years. In contrast, the State Department only sends 10 to 12 Foreign Service Officers to Congress each year as part of its Pearson congressional fellowship program.It is time for the State Department to reclaim its proper place alongside DOD as a chief incubator and executor of U.S. Foreign policy. The State Department must act now to increase the prestige of its own congressional fellowships and at least double the number of Foreign Service Officers working on the Hill.
Otherwise, it risks being completely overrun by DOD’s expanded legislative affairs activities.Fellowship Programs: DOD vs. StateSeveral of the most storied American military officers of the past generation spent at least some of their military careers serving in the civilian world of politics.
For more information about the update, see.For additional steps you can take if your Yahoo! Account can't sync with Mail for Windows 10, see.If you have a Japanese Yahoo! Email account you will need to do the following:.You'll need to add your Yahoo! Windows 10 yahoo account settings out of date.
Generals Colin Powell and Wesley Clark each served as White House Fellows in the Office of Management and Budget, where they helped prepare the President’s annual budget request for Congress. General James Jones, current National Security Advisor and former North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) commander, spent five years in the Navy-Marine Corps Senate liaison office on Capitol Hill. Perhaps most famously, Senator John McCain’s four years as Navy Senate liaison the “turning point” that started the former Navy Captain on the trajectory toward the Republican presidential nomination in 2008.After a rigorous application and selection process, the military fellowship usually unfolds in three phases: one or two months of training and orientation; one full year as a congressional fellow; and two full years afterwards on a “payback” or “utilization” tour in the service’s legislative liaison office or some other assignment requiring knowledge of Congress. Fellows lend their military expertise and perform a variety of functions, including crafting legislative language, writing questions and statements for oversight hearings, building support for new pieces of legislation, processing appropriation requests, drafting press statements and articles, responding to constituent mail, and accompanying the member on fact-finding trips. Congressional fellowships bestow invaluable political know-how on ambitious military officers. As one senior Republican committee staffer, “There is probably no better place in the U.S. Government where people learn how to deal with Congress and get their way in doing so, than in our military.”In contrast to the well-developed DOD operation, only between 10 and 12 congressional fellowships are available each year for State Department Foreign Service Officers (FSOs) through what is known as the.
The Pearson program is open to all generalist FSOs with seven years of experience and usually lasts for one year but can be extended for an additional year. Other routes for State employees to serve on the Hill include the American Political Science Association (APSA) and the Brookings Institution’s.Once selected, State Department congressional fellows follow a process similar to military fellowships: they must contact, interview with, and be selected by a congressional office before assuming the duties of a normal staffer.
Beyond this initial procedural similarity, however, State’s involvement in congressional fellowship programs is nowhere near as formalized or robust as the armed services. No payback or utilization tour is required for State the way it is for DOD. There is also no planned expansion of State’s fellowship programs to rival that being undertaken by DOD.
![]()
Moreover, participation in congressional fellowships is not encouraged in any of State’s personnel doctrine; in fact, FSOs often shy away from spending time working in Congress because of a fear that time spent away from the foreign circuit will harm their prospects for promotion.State fellows face an uphill battle once they start working on the Hill due to congressional staff members’ preconceived notions about the State Department’s lack of respect for Congress. One way to explain the State Department’s problems building congressional support is explained by the lack of competence both State and Congress associate with the “H” bureau, State’s office for legislative affairs. One senior Republican Senate committee staffer who previously worked in the Foreign Service the problem this way: “When I was in the Foreign Service, ‘H’ was like the idiot in the basement. It was not a career enhancing move to go there. In fact, it is where substandard people go to die bureaucratically.
It is part of the received wisdom of the Foreign Service that you hold ‘H’ in contempt.”RecommendationsIncreasing the State Department’s utilization of congressional fellowships is a necessary reform that must be implemented as soon as possible. If State changed its policy so fellows were required to serve payback tours in the “H” bureau after their time on the Hill, it could increase the competency of State’s legislative operations, keep State employees that Hill staffers knew and trusted involved with “H”, and bring former fellows’ rolodexes into the use of the State Department.
Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |